Mark Hamill revealed that he seriously considered leaving the U.S. due to Donald Trump’s leadership, but decided to stay, expressing frustration, disbelief, and dark humor at the political chaos that he believes will have long-lasting consequences.

In a candid and startling revelation, legendary actor Mark Hamill opened up about a period during Donald Trump’s presidency when he seriously considered leaving the United States, citing frustration with political leadership and national direction.

In an interview with The Times of London, Hamill detailed a conversation with his wife that underscored the depth of his disillusionment.

“I told my wife we were thinking of leaving the U.S. because of Trump,” Hamill recounted.

“She said, ‘I’m surprised you would allow him to force you out of your own country.’ That son of a bitch, I thought. I’m not leaving.”

Hamill, best known for his iconic role as Luke Skywalker in the Star Wars saga, elaborated on his struggles with the political climate.

He described the era as a mix of “bullying, incompetence, the people in place,” painting a picture of a country whose global standing was faltering.

To cope, he said he framed the unfolding events as a “thick, sprawling political novel,” finding a dark sort of entertainment in the absurdity of some of the proposals and public statements from political figures.

“The only way I can deal with it without going crazy and wanting to open my veins in a warm tub is to look at it like a thick, sprawling political novel.

It’s entertaining in a way because this could actually be the end,” Hamill explained. “Our status in the world has been crippled and that will reverberate for decades.”

He referenced specific moments that struck him as particularly outrageous, blending satire and disbelief.

“Making Canada a 51st state? Do you know how offensive that is? And then taking over Greenland and renaming the Gulf of Mexico.

The distractions are hilarious.” While these suggestions were widely discussed in media speculation, Hamill’s commentary reflects the frustration and incredulity felt by many public figures and citizens alike during Trump’s administration.

The actor’s remarks highlight the personal toll of political tension on high-profile Americans, revealing that even those accustomed to playing heroes on screen can feel powerless in the face of national crises.

Hamill’s statements also demonstrate his unique blend of humor and seriousness—acknowledging the absurdity of certain political discourse while stressing its tangible consequences.

Mark Hamill has long been vocal on social media and in interviews about political matters, often advocating for civic responsibility, environmental awareness, and human rights.

His decision to speak so openly about contemplating leaving the U.S. reflects both his deep concern for the direction of the country and his desire to use his public platform to engage audiences in reflection and discussion.

The context of these remarks also recalls the broader sentiment during Trump’s presidency, when numerous celebrities, public figures, and ordinary citizens entertained thoughts of relocating abroad due to dissatisfaction with political leadership.

Countries like Canada were often mentioned as potential destinations, sparking both serious conversations and satirical commentary.

Hamill’s reference to Canada as a potential 51st state ties directly into these ongoing discussions, blending his pointed critique with humor familiar to his fans.

In addition to his political commentary, Hamill has maintained a vibrant career in entertainment, continuing to engage audiences through voice acting, appearances at conventions, and advocacy work.

He has leveraged his fame to shed light on issues ranging from veteran affairs to science fiction literacy, often drawing parallels between the challenges faced by fictional heroes and the real-world complexities he observes.

Ultimately, Hamill’s reflections in this interview serve as both a personal confession and a cultural critique.

By framing the Trump years as a surreal political narrative, he highlights the emotional strain of navigating national and global instability while also reminding audiences of the enduring importance of civic engagement, critical thinking, and, sometimes, the necessity of humor in the darkest of times.

Through his words, Hamill invites readers to consider the intersection of celebrity influence, personal conviction, and political reality, providing a glimpse into the ways public figures grapple with national upheaval while balancing personal life, professional responsibilities, and their own moral compass.

This unfiltered glimpse into Hamill’s mindset offers a rare combination of vulnerability, satire, and social commentary, making clear that even those who have lived many heroic stories on screen are not immune to the frustrations and absurdities of real-world politics.