Divided Netizens Explode After Suitcase Murder Trial — Was This Justice for Two Children or a Cruel Twist of Fate?
The courtroom fell into a heavy silence as the verdict was read: guilty. Hakyung Lee, the woman accused of killing her two children and hiding their bodies in suitcases for years, stood with her head bowed, her hair covering her face, while the world watched in horror. For some, it was justice long delayed. For others, the scene raised chilling questions about grief, madness, and whether this was punishment — or persecution.
Lee’s story is as unsettling as it is heartbreaking. In 2018, just months after her husband died of cancer, Lee allegedly ended the lives of her children, Minu, 6, and Yuna, 8. Instead of a burial, their remains were hidden in suitcases inside an Auckland storage locker. For four long years, the children’s bodies remained undiscovered until 2022, when the unit’s contents were auctioned off. Buyers opened the luggage expecting old clothes — and instead found a nightmare.
At trial, Lee’s defense argued she was insane, a grieving widow who spiraled into a mental collapse after losing her husband. Prosecutors, however, painted a darker picture: a mother who chose silence, secrecy, and escape. She had fled to South Korea, changed her name, and tried to build a new life while the past lay zipped away in forgotten luggage. The jury deliberated for just hours before rejecting the insanity defense.
But outside the courtroom, the debate has only grown louder. On social media, divided netizens are tearing each other apart. One viral comment read: “This wasn’t justice, it was revenge. She was mentally broken, and the system ignored that.” Another countered sharply: “She killed her kids. End of story. Insanity isn’t an excuse for murder.”
Anonymous accounts claim to have leaked clips from inside the trial, showing Lee’s trembling hands as the guilty verdict was delivered. One blurry video allegedly caught her whispering, “I’m sorry, babies,” though skeptics argue the audio was edited to provoke sympathy. TikTok detectives have even slowed down courtroom footage, analyzing her bowed posture and asking if her grief was genuine or staged.
The ethical conflict has become impossible to ignore. Was Lee a murderer hiding behind mental illness, or a broken woman who lost herself in tragedy? A Facebook post with thousands of shares captured the tension perfectly: “The court said guilty. My heart says something darker is at play.”
Family members, strangely silent throughout the trial, have only deepened suspicions. No relatives have stepped forward publicly to condemn or defend Lee, sparking wild theories. Some netizens speculate that the family “knows more than they are saying.” Others believe cultural shame has kept them from speaking. Whatever the truth, the silence is deafening.
Even the timing of the discovery adds fuel to the fire. Why did the truth only come out after Lee stopped paying storage fees? Could the murders have been hidden forever if money hadn’t run out? One Reddit user posted: “This case isn’t just about a mother. It’s about how easy it is to bury the past until it rots its way back into the light.”
Justice Geoffrey Venning has delayed sentencing until November 26, but the punishment is clear: murder in New Zealand carries a mandatory life sentence. Still, for many, the case feels unfinished. Some call it justice finally served. Others whisper of hidden truths — a conspiracy of silence, an untold story behind a grieving widow’s mind.
And so the question lingers in every corner of the internet: was this a righteous verdict for two innocent children, or a cruel twist of fate that punished a woman already shattered by tragedy?